Showing posts with label GM. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GM. Show all posts

Saturday, 30 June 2012

In Defense of GM Plants

Not long ago, this came across my facebook wall:

I've long been an advocate for GM crops, but this claim was new to me.  Fortunately I have a wide range of friends, in various disciplines, to turn to when topics are not in my realm of expertise.  This time, I didn't even have to ask as a link to this article came from a plant pathologist friend not much later.

Go, read it.  I'll wait here while you do.

Complex right?  These issues are rarely as simple as we'd like.  We can accept that there may be some side affect of using GM crops.  Or we can go back to using pesticides and herbicides at very high levels, with known, worse, negative effects.

Now, I know what you are saying.  "But why can't we use non-GM crops and no herbicides, etc?"  Well, we can, but you are going to pay more for your food and get less of it.  These techniques allow farmers to grow more food more easily.  I think the telling statement in this article about weed control in corn production is this:
"There was no feasible way to establish an untreated level of
control without complete loss of yield due to weed competition."
So, the corn has to be treated with something.  What that something is is up to the farmer and decided based on their land, variety, and marketing desires.  Sure there are organic herbicides out there, but they require frequent application, typically in larger amounts.  They are also non-specific.  They kill everything, meaning application must be done carefully.


As with most things in life, there is no one answer, no perfect solution.   At least not yet.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, 25 June 2012

Deadly cyanide...

One of my mother's friends posted this CBS article to Facebook recently, and the story seems to be quickly making the rounds of many blogs and news agencies.

This article makes a couple claims, which I am going to go through separately, then give a quick "big picture".

1) Claim "The grass is a genetically-modified form of Bermuda known as Tifton 85"

       Tifton 85 is the name of the grass, right off the bat I can tell you that is was developed in 1985 at the UGA experiment station in Tifton, GA.  That's the easy part.  A little bit of looking brought me to the UGA site on Tifton 85.  The page says that Tifton 85 is a hybrid variety of grass produced from cross-breeding a South African Grass with a bermudagrass.  Personally, I would not consider this a GMO, it was not produced via gene splicing or other techniques in a lab, but rather by normal, everyday breeding.  Similar to crossing a horse and donkey to get a mule.
     Tifton 85 is a sterile pentaploid. While sterility can be caused by chemicals and lab techniques (these are used to produce those seedless watermelons we all love), Tifton 85 is naturally sterile (like a mule) because it's a crass between two genera with differing chromosome numbers.  Basically, it can't reproduce naturally as it has an odd number of chromosomes, so gametes (sperm and eggs) are unstable.  So, mutation isn't impossible, but I'd say extremely unlikely.  It is much more likely that a gene that is normally lowly expressed was up-regulated due to adverse conditions such as drought or heat.

2) Claim: "Preliminary tests revealed the Tifton 85 grass, which has been here for years, had suddenly started producing cyanide gas, poisoning the cattle."

      Many common plants are cyanogenic.    It is produced naturally as a part of plant nutrient metabolism.  Cyanide functions as an anti-herbivory agent in plants.  The cyanide is typically stored as cyanic glucoside (cyanide sugars).  When the plant matter is damaged (chewed/digested) glucosidase enzymes break down these sugars releasing hydrogen cyanide gas (HCN).  This process can also occur naturally in the plant during stress conditions (i.e. drought, frost, wilting) or naturally occurring damage to the plant(i.e. trampling, bruising, etc).  High levels of nitrogen fertilizer can also increase HCN production in plants.

     If the cyanide sugars and enzymes are high enough in the plant before or during ingestion by the animal then the level of cyanide production can be very high natural.  Considering the very hot summer so far (especially in Texas) I would guess that this pasture was just producing very high levels of cyanide.  Cattle and other animals can handle very small amounts of cyanide, as they have evolved with these plants.  But they have also learned to avoid them.  It's when the levels are too high that there is a problem.
 
     Cyanide production has been known to be a problem in several species of grasses commonly planted (Johnson grass, Sudan grass, clovers, etc), though most reports I have found indicate that Tifton 85 has very low natural production.  For species with known high natural cyanide production it is recommended that livestock not graze them unless they are fully mature or dried as hay (cyanide is volatile and will dissipate when the dried plant is exposed to air).  This is not the first instance of cyanide poisoning occurring from a plant not generally believed to be a high producer.

Big picture: Tifton 85 is a naturally bred hybrid grass, not a lab-devloped GMO.  Plants produce cyanide naturally, especially when growing under drought conditions.  While Bermudagrass isn't know to have high levels of cyanide production, apparently in this case condition were just right.